← All domains

Cross-cutting

APRF-23

Platform Engineering

Make the safe path the easy path—paved roads that apply across every APRF domain.

Purpose

Provide builders with paved roads—SDKs, templates, local evals, guardrails, and documentation—so secure and operable defaults are the path of least resistance across all domains.

Engineering philosophy

Platform engineering is a cross-cutting control, not a peer readiness domain. Friction on unsafe paths and speed on safe ones determine whether other pillars are actually followed.

Why it matters

If the approved gateway is hard and the raw provider key is easy, builders will bypass controls. DX debt becomes security and reliability debt.

Common failures

  • No internal AI platform or golden paths
  • Docs that explain policy but not how to comply
  • Slow security review with no self-serve checklists
  • Local development that cannot run evals or policy checks

Mandatory checks

Gate controls. Each check is pass/fail via artifact + pass condition. Expected from the annotated capability level when the system meets the minimum criticality tier.

  • DX-M1L3 · DefinedTier 2 · Productionmanual

    Builders shall have a documented golden path for deploying AI features to production

    Artifact
    Golden-path documentation with steps from scaffold to production
    Pass condition
    Doc exists with version/owner; covers auth, secrets, evals, and promote steps; reviewed ≤ 12 months
  • DX-M2L3 · DefinedTier 2 · Productionautomated

    Local or CI self-serve checks shall cover critical mandatory controls (auth, secrets, basic evals)

    Artifact
    CI/local check config covering auth, secrets, and basic evals
    Pass condition
    Default AI pipeline runs auth, secret-scan, and basic eval checks; failing any blocks merge/promote in the golden-path template
  • DX-M3L3 · DefinedTier 2 · Productionmanual

    Ownership and support channel shall exist for the AI platform/paved road

    Artifact
    Platform ownership record + support channel (on-call, Slack, ticket queue)
    Pass condition
    Named owner team and support channel documented; channel responds to a test ping within published SLA or has on-call rotation listed

Evidence required

  • Golden path documentation
  • Template/repository inventory
  • Support ownership for AI platform

Severity & risk

Severity
medium
Impact if violated
Risk level
medium
Typical residual risk (impact × likelihood)

Engineering best practices

  • Default SDKs inject tracing, auth, and budget headers
  • Provide copy-paste threat model and APRF checklist stubs
  • Measure and reduce friction for approved tools
  • Celebrate teams that use paved roads in readiness reviews

Automatic validations

  • Template CI that fails if safe defaults are removed
  • Telemetry on gateway vs direct-provider usage
  • Lint rules guiding builders to approved libraries

Manual validations

  • Builder interviews on friction points
  • Periodic DX reviews with security and platform teams

Examples

  • create-agent CLI scaffolds an agent with budgets, authz hooks, and eval stubs
  • A PR template links to the APRF pillar checklist for the feature type

References

Crosswalks

  • §7 Support

    ISO/IEC 42001 · partial

  • CC5 Control Activities

    SOC 2 Trust Services Criteria · evidence-for

  • Operational Excellence Operational Excellence

    AWS Well-Architected Framework · aligns-with

  • Level 3 Hardened builds

    SLSA (Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts) · partial

Future evolution

Shared open-source APRF linters, project templates, and inner-loop conformance checks adopted across ecosystems.